Many film composers will say that the best kind of score is one where the audience won’t even really notice. Others like Clint Mansell in a recent interview, thinks that’s completely the opposite, and that film scores should be integrated within a film, that a film would lose a large part of its narrative without it.
But in the end isn’t it true that a film shouldn’t rely on the score to express its ideas through the visual language of film? Discuss the advantages of the more "invisible" approach and the more integrated approach to film scoring.
The best film scores are ones where the characters have their own music when they enter a scene. Like the iconic Darth Vader music. DA DA DA DEE DA. Automatically invokes the feeling of the introduction to an evil presence. Imagine the Lion King without the opening score. Wouldn't be the same. – Munjeera4 years ago
In a tv documentary of composer Aaron Copeland, he said when he did film scores, he musically portrayed the unconscious thoughts of the characters on the screen. One example that was illustrated was in the Heiress, the woman was playing it cool when her boyfriend said he was leaving, but the music had lots of tension in it. – DrTestani4 years ago
This would be a very interesting article to read especially since there are many advantages to both sides. I would love to see if the author ends up ultimately choosing a specific side and why (in reference to a specific movie that may really speak to them). – areej234 years ago
Would love to see the score of Batman v Superman be discussed as I loved the "in your face" music during fights and the individual theme music for each character. Also, soundtracks? Guardians of the Galaxy, 500 Days of Summer - the tone of these movies were set by their soundtracks and people adore them. – blameshobhon4 years ago
I think the score, i.e. the instrumental music, should be background music which fits seamlessly with what you're watching, thus together with the visual, it creates a multi-sensory experience which would be incomplete without either part. For an example, see any score by Trent Reznor for David Fincher's films. For film soundtracks, however, I feel it's better if these stand out, as they can, as someone above stated, define the film (GotG, Pulp Fiction) – J.P. Shiel4 years ago
Much of this discussion should revolve around the source of music chosen for a film and the way in which it fits a film's genre, form, and style. Diegetic music (that has an onscreen source accessible to the film's characters) adds realism by defining a film's time and place. Non-diegetic music (that has no onscreen source) most frequently defines mood. The use of one or the other (or both) depends on a film's particular characteristics. – ptoro4 years ago