Contributing writer for The Artifice.
Junior Contributor I
Do bestselling novels stifle author creativity?Something I've been thinking about lately is how competitive getting published is. Novelists who want to write a "less accessible" kind of story may find themselves struggling with finding an audience, or even an interested agent. Meanwhile, the list of national bestsellers is filled with novels that, generally, play it safe. For instance, The Girl on the Train is regarded in its promotional material as another Gone Girl. Would the former have been written the way it was or even be written at all if the latter didn't precede it? Are the heavily publicized novels becoming too homogeneous? And how is this reflected across genres?
|
How 'By the Book' Should Literary Adaptations Be? | |
I wonder, though, if we could isolate any examples where the music works against the film. Every film’s score adds another dimension to the work as a whole, but it’s only the well-scored films that remain in our memory after the end credits roll and that truly give greater impact to the image. Is it possible that the dichotomy between picture and sound can be great enough that there isn’t an enhancements, but a detraction from the overall experience? | The Big Score: Music in Film (2015) |
One proof for the continuing indelibly of the novel is its conversation with other forms of media, particularly film. There’s a perception that the novel, print media in particular, is dying yet we see countless adaptations of these novels into highly popular films and TV shows every year. Especially with teen fiction. The novels from which other media are created achieve acclaim by their merits as literature before adaptations; and these adaptations drive increased book sales. Harry Potter, The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo, and Game of Thrones all belong to this category. While it often seems that literature is being lost amidst the plethora of emergent new media, the relationship between all entertainment art forms guaranteed that none of them “dies” as it were. | Is the Novel Dead? |
Ultimately, you’re dealing with two different mediums that require entirely different tool sets to achieve their objectives (telling a story). It’s easy to gripe about how a long section of a novel was reduced to montage or how certain plot elements were cut, but oftentimes it’s that pragmatic editing that reveals to us what is a flawed novel, overblown with plot. That’s not to say this is the case with every adaptation, but in the interest of transferring the main narrative of a work of fiction onto film, concessions are inevitable. With every adaptation, it requires a viewer who understands narrative structure in both film and literature and who understands the “why” aspect regarding changes from one to another (and whether those changes are legitimate in the interest of a film on the terms of a film).