kristinagreta

Contributing writer for The Artifice.

Junior Contributor I

?

Articles
0
Featured
0
Comments
3

Ext. Comments
3
Processed
0
Revisions
0

Topics
1
Topics Taken
0
Notes
1

Topics Proc.
0
Topics Rev.
0

Points
71
Rank
X
Score
35

Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.

Latest Topics

literature

Write this topic

How Relevant is Understanding Context in Understanding a Piece of Writing?

Have we, as the 21st century audience, begun to read into literature through a pattern we've created ourselves? It seems as though we are often taught that there is a set pattern of symbols that we often apply to teaching and learning any piece without considering whether it is of any relevance, stating that the author "may be saying…" Should context, thus, still be considered crucial in reading into a piece of somebody's work since it is our only valuable piece of information; the only one given to us for certain about the author's thoughts through their background? Is it the only way of veritably analysing somebody's work or should there, rather, be left some thought to the reader's imagination?

Interesting topic. You could also address the Death of the Author concept (which might relate more to authorial intent but you could easily tie that into context). – Sadie Britton 8 years ago
1
I would argue context is still valuable and that often, you can't take a story completely out of context and expect it to be completely understood. For example, could you set a Holocaust story in the 1990s? You could certainly imitate *elements*, but without the background of Nazi Germany, Hitler's rise to power, and so on, is it really a Holocaust story? Is a story promoting feminism in the 1960s really the same if you take it out of the '60s and put it in 2017, when feminism is much more familiar and accepted? Then again, Jane Austen and other authors have had their work retooled for almost any time period and location you could name, so who knows? – Stephanie M. 8 years ago
0
It's impossible to take a story completely out of its context, but at the same time you can't always get the entire context. I think we should at least be attempting to understand context. For example, I read Pride and Prejudice without looking into Austen's time at all. Later, I read the book as part of a class whose sole focus was to understand the novel in context and i found it to be a much richer experience. I understood the plights of the characters better and picked up on subtleties that I hadn't noticed before. Part of the fun of reading is analyzing what the author might have meant, so I do think there is plenty of room for imagination. However, context is key. – itsverity 8 years ago
0

Sorry, no tides are available. Please update the filter.

Latest Comments

Feb 20, 2017 kristinagreta I have always loved reading, but I find that sadly, before moving to England, I never met a teacher willing to explain analysis of a literary piece to me, thus most of my early reading was based on sole enjoyment. I had to re-read a piece to notice detail, whereas now I find that I notice many more even as I read somebody’s work for the first time. It is brilliant to see just how much depth there can be found in one’s writing!	Why Reread Books? The Pros and Cons of Rereading
Feb 20, 2017 kristinagreta Although I do agree with the general viewpoint that fanfiction isn’t deserving of immense credit for great writing and originality, I do find that it is a brilliant way to get people even more interested in the original piece of work. I also find that it has helped both me and some friends develop a wider vocabulary!	Fanfiction: The Merits of Originality
Feb 20, 2017 kristinagreta This article gives some lovely ideas! I have coursework for my Creative Writing AS due next week. I’m submitting a poetry collection and a short story; I find it much more difficult to produce a solid plot for the story though. I really like the idea of writing notes on characters, it should be very useful; thank you!	A Writer's Essential Steps to Staying Motivated