Contributing writer for The Artifice.

Junior Contributor I

  • Articles
  • Featured
  • Comments
  • Ext. Comments
  • Processed
  • Revisions
  • Topics
  • Topics Taken
  • Notes
  • Topics Proc.
  • Topics Rev.
  • Points
  • Rank
  • Score
    Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.

    Latest Topics


    The value of ‘bad’ art

    Explore the notion of creativity for creativity’s sake. With Covid-19 isolation, we are seeing a lot of people filling time by making things, from banana bread to paintings. What is the value of making stuff, even if it’s not ‘good’ aka. not pretty, or moving, or delicious. You could also explore what makes people identify as ‘creative’ or not – what is the difference between an ‘artist’ v. ‘someone who makes art’?

    • Interesting topic! Creating is therapeutic in itself. It does not have to be pretty, or yummy--the process of creating is in our own human nature and within the process we find things out about ourselves. Instead of the value of bad art it could be The value of the process of creating. The artist and someone who makes art is a whole other debate and topic--that makes something "art" and something just a creation. I think that depends on your training. Anyone can pick up a drum or some kitchen utensils and play a beat or sing to make music, but a musician is someone who studied and trained in music for years---but everyone and anyone can make music. The same with art. The title of an artist and musician comes with level of education I believe, but that does not mean you can't be an artist by just drawing at home. Anyone and everyone can be a creator and an artist of some sort. Maybe narrow down the topic to either the benefits or what makes the difference between an artist and someone who makes art. – birdienumnum17 4 years ago
    • Well, the advantage of "bad" work (whether so-bad-it's-good or just plain bad) is that it provides an example of what not to do. For instance, the example of the Twilight series shows that if you want to write a supernatural romance, you should NOT make the supernatural partner abuse or lord it over the more "ordinary" one. More generally, for someone who is creating just because they want to, an initial work, for all its faults, provides a jumping-off point that they can use to refine their craft, by learning from their prior mistakes. – Debs 4 years ago
    • In order to get good at anything we have to go through the initial stages of learning. Writing off the abilities of people in the initial stages of harnessing their craft will stunt their growth. How about an article about the importance of amateur creativity, which is is so often undermined in the bid for commercial success. Not everyone will "make it" big in the industry but that dosent de value the joy in the embodied experience of the creative process. Let's move away from the neoliberal obsession with perfectionism and embrace humanity. – MayWoods 3 years ago
    • I like this topic, because I'd argue that bad art is very important. You have to accept it as part of growing and improving, and being committed to any kind of art practice at all. This quote from Vonnegut is particularly relevant to the argument that I'd make: "Practice any art, music, singing, dancing, acting, drawing, painting, sculpting, poetry, fiction, essays, reportage, no matter how well or badly, not to get money and fame, but to experience becoming, to find out what's inside you, to make your soul grow." Also worth mentioning is the Museum of Bad Art in Boston. There's a lot of directions you could go with this article :) – Cleo Newling 2 years ago

    Sorry, no tides are available. Please update the filter.

    Latest Comments

    What a great piece! I am an arts and cultural studies student and spend a lot of time hunched over my laptop or book. I have found that even the most basic of stretches, when performed daily, make such a huge difference to my neck and back, and in turn my productivity!

    Enhancing Performance: Self-Care for All Artists

    This is such an interesting piece!
    Orphans in literature serve as fantastic story telling devices, particularly in novels, because they are forced to make their own way in the world, and therefore are more susceptible to circumstances which lead to adventure and to an interesting story. The motherless heroine in fairytales is an interesting trope. I do think it exist partly for the same reasons that orphans in other literature (Oliver Twist, Harry Potter, Anne of Green Gables) exist. However, we cannot ignore the points made by others about the traditional role of the mother as opposed to that of the father. In fairy tales, the father is often presented as loving but unable to care properly and completely for the daughter, who eventually finds stability by marrying a prince. What does this say about our expectations of mothers vs fathers?

    Missing Moms and the Fairytale Characters Living Without Them

    I agree with @bable – for me, the Malfoys (particularly Draco) are the most terrifying antagonists because they represent the banality of evil. Draco isn’t inherently a bad person (as we discover in the Cursed Child) but he has been brought up to play a role in a regime that is far, far bigger than him. This certainly doesn’t excuse his actions, but does explain them.

    Harry Potter: The Importance of Antagonists