Park Chan-wook: Five reasons you should be stoked for Stoker
South Korea has produced some phenomenal films and directorial talent, particularly over the last decade-and-a-half. Amongst the very best the country has to offer, there is one particular genre-blurring, multi-tasking director who stands out. That director is Park Chan-Wook.
Park has written and directed some of the most provocative and stylistically-inventive movies ever to come out of Asia. The obvious starting point would be the notorious Vengeance Trilogy, which consists of Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance, Oldboy and Lady Vengeance. Each film contains touchy themes, immaculately-shot scenes and virtuoso flashes of violence. Sure, they won’t be everyone’s cup of tea, but there’s no doubting that Park genuinely dares and dazzles. Luckily, this guy is no one-trick-pony. North/South Korean border drama Joint Security Area shows a director with dramatic flair and a gentle hand when necessary; and Thirst sees Park try his hand at a vampire movie (with disturbing/humorous/borderline insane results).
The guy can – and will – do it all, and he does so with a comic streak as black as coal. So, apart from this torrent of praise for the man, why should we care about his upcoming English-language debut Stoker? Here’s why:
1. Stoker was included in Hollywood’s 2010 “Black List” of the best unproduced scripts
The “Black List” is always an interesting read. Each year a group of 300-some producers vote for their favourite unproduced scripts, and the list can act as great exposure for some very good pieces. Check out 2010’s list here.
So it was written by Wentworth “Prison Break” Miller…that is what I’d call an intriguing proposition. Great films like The Social Network and Juno had their scripts voted pretty high on the Black List in the past, and as you can see, there were some fantastic entries in 2010. Argo is receiving rave reviews across the board, Margin Call was a super-talky delight and Chronicle tore the found-footage genre a new one. Sure, there’s no guarantee that they’ll all be winners, but Stoker has an awful lot of solid talent onboard…
2. The Talent
Park has attracted plenty of great talent to help him out, both on and off-screen. First of all we’ve got Nicole Kidman, who has been known to pull out the odd show-stopping performance (Rabbit Hole, anyone?). Then there’s the likable, multi-faceted Matthew Goode, who has a certain evil charisma that served him well as Adrian Veidt/Ozymandias in Zack Snyder’s admirable Watchmen adap Considering he is playing quite a sinister chap in Stoker, we could see a performance that will make ’em squirm in their seats. The lead triumvirate is completed by promising youngster Mia Wasikowska, who did a great job in TV’s In Treatment as a troubled teen; so much so that we can forgive her for her involvement with Alice in Wonderland.
Away from the lens, Clint Mansell is on scoring duty, which is exciting since this is the man who did such sterling work with the original music for Swan Lake to add an extra layer of atmosphere to Black Swan.
Promisingly, those four won’t be the only talent involved…
3. Park has brought a skilled friend along for the ride
Park Chan-wook has a reputation for some very striking shots in his films, and in part, that’s largely thanks to the abilities of cinematographer Chung-hoon Chung. Chung has been a part of Team Park since Oldboy back in `03, and since then he has treated us to countless visually arresting scenes. Most notably, Thirst is a feast of stark contrasts, bleak vistas and nocturnal wonderlands. Chung’s cinematography turns murky interiors into skin-crawling spaces of possibility, blank stares into unfathomable mysteries and copious amounts of blood into an all-encompassing sea of crimson. Stoker looks set to continue the trend, with the trailer (here) looking like another visual home-run for Park and Chung.
4. QT is a big fan…
Every cinephile’s favourite motor-mouth is a big fan of Park’s work. He named Joint Security Area as one of his favourite films from 1992-2009. Check out his excellent list here. In 2004, QT was on the jury at Cannes film festival, where Oldboy picked up the Grand Prix, thanks in part to QT’s enthusiasm for the film and Park’s work generally. Considering he is one of the most revered filmmakers in the world right now, QT’s praise should not be dismissed. Also, Spike Lee seems enamoured enough with Oldboy to direct an English-language remake originally championed by a certain Mr. Spielberg; and if it’s good enough for Steve, it’s good enough for you!
5. Park is a true original
In a world filled with by-the-numbers rom-coms, shameless cash-ins and one good OTT action movie for every 50 made, a voice as original and daring as Park Chan-wook’s is vital. There is only a handful of directors who can tread the lines between genres as deftly and audaciously as Park, and when the world has the chance to embrace a talent such as his, that can only be a good thing. Who else could combine genuinely erotic lovemaking scenes with pitch-black humour as he does in Thirst? Who else would have the bravery to one-take a scene as pivotal as the infamous “hallway hammer-fight” in Oldboy? You’ve got to admire Park’s guts. He is highly regarded for the filmmaker he is right now, yet he is ready to stake his reputation on an original script; a real rarity in today’s cinematic climate. For that, and so much more, Park Chan-wook deserves your attention, respect and, most certainly, your time. If his previous work is anything to go by, Stoker will be a winner.
What do you think? Leave a comment.
I didn’t know about it being one of the best unproduced scripts, that is mental! This is going to be a great ride! Cheers for the info!
Makes for very a very interesting proposition…for someone to gamble on it and then in turn “gamble” on Park suggests this has the potential to be excellent.
Good read Tatt. I have Joint Security Area sitting on my shelf waiting to be watched, it’s really an injustice to it considering Oldboy is in my top 10 list.
Thanks man. I don’t think I dislike any of Park’s films. You’re always guaranteed something interesting and (probably) absolutely mental.
I’ll go out and say that I am intrigued. Tickets!
I went to see Thirst at one of the smaller cinemas here in Liverpool, and I’m really glad I did. I think Park’s work is made for the big screen, and Stoker looks like it will continue the trend.
A skeptic here. This is Park’s first hollywood production so god knows how the producers are pushing him around. Remember that film production is very different in South Korea than Hollywood and not all directors adapt well.
Definitely a potential stumbling block for the project, I agree. I could have just as easily written an article about possible stumbling blocks, but I have faith with this one. I think it would have been very easy to bring in any old director to fill the slot, but to go out and pick someone as left-field as Park suggests that they haven’t brought him in to just do as he is told. The producers have a very credible back catalogue of involvement between them, and I think that eased my worries somehwat. I wouldn’t say I was skeptical myself, more concerned that (worst case scenario) you could be right.
Clint Mansell scoring is a stroke of genius. Drive had my favorite music in any movie last year, and his score for Mass Effect 3 was fantastic.
Did Clint score Drive? There is something that I did not know. He is one of my favorites too.
I think his score was very good for Drive, I was a big fan of the movie. The use of original songs in very cool places (“Nightcall” over the opening credits for example), seemed to overshadow the score a little, but once you start to pick out Mansell’s music, it really is impressive stuff!
“The lead triumvirate is completed by promising youngster Mia Wasikowska, who did a great job in TV’s In Treatment as a troubled teen; so much so that we can forgive her for her involvement with Alice in Wonderland.”
Wow, that’s just bad, and not only because MW is reduced to an afterthought in this article despite the fact that she’s the movie’s front-and-center character.
Mia has already established herself as one of the best young actresses out there (The Kids are All Right, Jane Eyre, etc, plus countless other upcoming projects), so “promising” is outdated. And I’m tired of people bagging her performance in Alice, as she was easily the best thing about the film, considering it was her first lead role and she spent most of it in front of green screens (ask Ian McKellen about his experiences with that in The Hobbit), and it proved crucial in jumpstarting her US film career.
Lastly, “Nicola” Kidman? Copyediting, anyone?
Mia, as far as I’m concerned, is still a promising youngster. Sure, she’s done fine in some good roles, but she’s yet to do anything to catapult her beyond promising. I mean promising in the grand scheme of actors out there – as in she’s not exactly Michelle Williams/Meryl Streep etc. I don’t say it to belittle her in the slightest, I’m sorry if that’s how you felt it came across, because her best roles are probably ahead of her. I still felt she was a little offputting (not terrible) in Alice in Wonderland, maybe because it was her first lead. However, being the best thing in Alice is like saying you’re the least-dead person 6-feet under in a graveyard. She isn’t an afterthought at all, I’m keen to see her progress. I just wanted to give a wide overview of why Stoker could be very good, my focus for the article is the film as a whole. I appreciate the feedback though, thanks for reading. If you want to discuss more, feel free to PM me.
In fact, you can’t PM me unfortunately. Comment here if you like, but let’s keep it as fair as we have done.
It looks like he is innovative because of his research abilities and that he knows where to look.