Could ‘Geordie Shore’ And ‘Made in Chelsea’ Be Impacting On The Way We View Social Class?

Growing up as a teenager in the noughties, I’ve watched my fair share of reality television. Though I cannot call myself an avid watcher or a fan of the likes of The X Factor or Big Brother, I’ve seen enough of it to understand just how this genre of television works. Reality television has become a popular culture phenomenon in modern day society. It’s very rare we find ourselves with a night without it, or a magazine or day time television show without a reality contestant featured. It’s become a culture people aspire to be a part of, an easy access to catapult themselves to a life of celebrity and stardom. This appears to be the main attraction of reality television. The fifteen minutes of fame it brings to ‘normal everyday people’ that is so inviting.

Reality television is able to bring up many different representations, stereotypes and arguments. It has become an important way to look directly into what is happening in our society. I would go so far as to say that recent reality television could even be furthering the divide between class systems through representations of different regions. This seems to be featured in the reality television shows Geordie Shore, set in the north east, and Made in Chelsea, set in London. They feature people who are a part of this reality television generation. Both television programmes feature this new age of people doing whatever it takes to get their fifteen minutes of fame, including furthering their regional and class stereotypes.

Being from the north east of England as soon as I heard MTV were remaking America’s Jersey Shore for a British audience, least of all in the place where I’m from, was not the best idea I’d heard of. Geordie Shore exploded onto our screens in 2011 on MTV and is now onto its sixth series. It appeared to become popular for all the wrong reasons, representing an extremely exaggerated Geordie stereotype. The first series showed the eight over the top Geordies drinking alcohol frequently and excessively, getting tanned, ‘pulling’ numerous ‘ birds’ and fighting and shouting amongst each other. Some of the castmates even had catchphrases, some being pieces of literature gold such as ‘I should have a degree in pulling women’ or ‘I would never kiss anyone without a six-pack’. I have watched the odd episode just to see how my town was being represented, needless to say I didn’t enjoy what I was seeing. To me, it was all the worst parts of the Geordie stereotype compacted which was then shown to audiences.

geordie-shore-image-2-252832381Geordie Shore is a negative and exaggerated representation of the northern stereotype. It represents the cast as ‘idiots’ who are only good for getting drunk, partying and having sex. This is all shown very clearly to the audience watching which then impacts onto ideologies. The show represents an extremely exaggerated version of what people from Newcastle actually act or even look like. Audiences find themselves watching these people in fascination and then perhaps even recoiling in horror to. Perhaps audiences watch this programme just to show they are ‘better’ than those they are viewing. This seems to be a new pulling point to get people to watch reality television. The second hand embarrassment we feel while watching these kinds of television shows has almost become an appeal to watch. The people featured are largely there to be laughed at and ridiculed by the audience.

This brings me onto the topic of how class can be represented in reality television. Though these people were clearly not ‘poor’ or typically appearing to be ‘working class’, the north east still has this stereotype and notion of being a fundamentally working class area. The Geordie accent is also mostly related to working class lifestyles. Stereotypically, most people who think of Geordies think of the working class and the lifestyle that comes with it. Alcohol and drunkenness is also sometimes linked more to the working class over other social classes and this is a key theme in Geordie Shore

Continuing this theme of social class, there is also the representation of the upper classes in reality television. Geordie Shore is a polar opposite to E4’s Made in Chelsea. It’s onto its fifth series and also just won a BAFTA from the people’s choice category, showing the power and popularity of this television show. Made in Chelsea is set in London, in one of the poshest and richest areas and shows the problems of the young people who live there. It shows superiority and class, making it a complete contrast to Geordie Shore. You’ll not find any scenes of people vomiting after drinking themselves silly here. There is a certain classiness and pride attached to it to show the middle and upper class lifestyle.

But both television shows are massively different in their representations of their castmates. Made in Chelsea’s cast are much more sophisticated and well spoken compared to those on Geordie Shore. Both shows feature people around the same age and mostly show relationship problems. They fundamentally represent the same issues. But they represent exaggerated stereotypes from the north and south, which only broadens and impacts onto audience’s ideologies. Though London does have a large population of working class people, the Made in Chelsea lifestyle and ideology makes London look like a largely middle and upper class area, thus furthering the divide between the north and south. People are being impacted on to believe that these representations are real and true, when in fact the scenarios the cast find themselves in or what they say are mostly made up for the audiences own entertainment.

From the way they are both directed is also interesting and shows what could even be the British north and south divide happening in front of our very eyes. They have connotations to show their working and upper class lifestyles. Geordie Shore is shot similarly to Big Brother with numerous cameras following their every move. The cast also live together in a large house. Big Brother is even narrated by a man with a Geordie accent. They have interviews showing how they really feel about the people they are living with. They excessively swear and use northern slang, we see them drink, have sex and party. Geordie Shore appears to be a documentary on the stereotypical Geordie and northern working class lifestyle. Made in Chelsea appears more like a scripted soap opera, with people ‘unexpectedly’ appearing out of nowhere in the same scene as another person to create an awkward atmosphere. There are long pauses of people just glancing blandly at each other very dramatically. They also are suddenly able to jet off around the world without a moment’s notice, showing the amount of money and power they obtain.

MADE+IN+CHELSEA+CASTMade in Chelsea is shot with more elegance, grace and with beautiful shots of London. There also seems to be a running theme of the colour white intended to show the cleanness of Chelsea and other London areas. This could even help to connote the cleanness and superiority of the upper classes. There is a more intentional gracious and stylish atmosphere created. Whereas Geordie Shore shows its castmates rolling around the floor in drunkenness, partying in numerous clubs playing the lastest overbearing dance music. I believe these two television shows represent the north negatively, and the south in a more positive manner. Geordie Shore is much more up front and vulgar. Made in Chelsea is more sophisticated and tame. These could be argued to be the stereotypical north and south representations we have been impacted on through the media repeatedly.

To me, reality television has a great amount of power over its audiences. Reality TV helps create ideas of people, classes, and the areas they are set in. It has an ability to show a certain lifestyle for either positive or negative reasons. Reality television is supposed to represent realism, yet it shows a small minority of people from these areas who actually behave like this for the cameras and for the celebrity lifestyle they want to obtain. These reality television shows, and many others, represent the exaggerated stereotypes and way of life from these different regions and social classes. This then can impact dramatically on how people view these areas. They become the only image people see of these representations and regions. We need to pay more attention to what is happening onscreen to see the real issues being represented. Reality television must be taken seriously to understand what kind of society we are creating around us through our media consumption. We have to notice the kind of themes we are watching which are able to impact onto our own ideologies. In conclusion, reality television is able to not only be a form of entertainment, but also a way to create powerful ideologies of social classes like never before. It has a significant power over our own ideas and ultimately our views of social classes.

What do you think? Leave a comment.

Posted on by
Film and media graduate trying to find her way in the world.

Want to write about TV or other art forms?

Create writer account

18 Comments

  1. Charles Tica
    0

    Nice read Georgia, but IMo the thing that we can learn from reality TVs like these is that, first, it is all stages, and second, people have a bad taste in chosing their series.

  2. Michelle Webb

    Good insight to what these cringe-worthy shows are actually representing.

  3. Shanti Stauffer
    0

    Great article! Some of these reality shows work very well to numb your mind after a long day at work.

  4. Amelia Roberts
    1

    This is a really interesting article. The level to which media, reality TV included, influences our ideologies and the way we view each other in real life shouldn’t be underestimated and your conclusion effectively highlights how it should be taken much more seriously than it currently seems to be. Reality TV is becoming less and less about realism and more and more about ratings, and that’s exceedingly problematic.

    • Georgia

      I think that’s the main problem, the money it can make and the ratings are more sort after than anything else. Thanks for your comment 🙂

  5. Aliya Gulamani
    Aliya Gulamani
    1

    Very interesting article – what I found most intriguing was not only how the context is deliberately manipulated to reinforce certain stereotypes but also the use of cinematography – the difference – as you describe, in the way the said programmes are filmed creates different conceptions – such an intriguing method of seducing the audience to view things in a certain way.
    It seems that reality television is the dominant television style but one wonders for how much longer, considering as you say, that it contradicts its own genre. In creating established “realities” – it doesn’t seem very realistic at all! It’s a shame as there could be many benefits in such television, learning about different cultures and so on, but this is bypassed in the preference of creating entertainment.

    • Thomas Currington

      I think reality tv shows remain powerless as long as people remember that they aren’t like reality. If they were like reality they wouldn’t be interesting.

    • Georgia

      Thank you so much for your comment! I agree with you with your comment about ‘seducing the audience’ in order to impact onto their views. Again thanks for your feedback!

  6. Thomas Currington

    That comment wasn’t meant as a reply, I pressed the wrong button

  7. Kathryn Graham

    I often think about reality TV shows and their impact on society. It’s pretty scary how obsessed people can get with them, I even know people who act like their “favourites” from Made in Chelsea. Cringe-worthy stuff!

  8. I think where people who question reality TV and its negative aspects become confused is that, the point of reality television is to ultimately entertain and while it does it in ways that shed negative light on certain social groups, it has to be taken on the chin and not taken too seriously.

    I am not denying the power that television and the media has over society and how it acts. But if the purpose of these shows are to entertain and we as an audience are being ‘entertained’ if TV ratings are anything to go by, then what does this say about us as viewers. Maybe these class expectations already existed and are simply being re-affirmed.

  9. Great article, got me pondering about these shows. I really wish they could have just tried to use the time and the money, the bandwidth and the television signal to do something great, but instead, their pursuit with zeal was to make something that parodies and fences in young people everywhere, portraying them being utterly shallow, plastic, short of attention and blissfully unaware of the rest of the world and its effect on them. I could write an essay on how Channel Four’s ‘Benefit Street’ seems to use creative editing to reinforce a negative stereotypes and attitudes towards the unemployed. Made in Chelsea does show the London cast and their setting more favourably, but it’s fascinating that what these two hold in common, is that we are essentially watching ‘lay about’ youths on both side of the class divide.

    When I watch this show I just get the feeling that I am watching something that is almost propagandically neo-liberal, a fantasy world full of inexhaustibly abundant numbers of young people with nothing really to do, with throw away clothes and throw away values, where everyone wants for nothing, but every one is cheap, and where stupidness and humiliation is the only way to popularity but yet intelligence, respect and thoughtfulness are as alien as, well, actual aliens.

    The beautiful thing about reality TV, (including staged reality TV like we are discussing here) is that when you watch it, you are not objectively looking in on the plot and it’s message, it’s that you are encouraged into the world, that you are in the centre, looking at cause and effect unfold around you, this is by virtue of the fact that in ‘reality’ TV, actions have consequences that can’t be predicted and haven’t been written by an author. This makes it all the more gratifying as a viewer. My main problem (clearly among many) with shows like this, is their attempt to convince us that these fake hollow people are real people, people to aspire to, beautiful, bubbly, vibrant people full of youth and joy. It doesn’t take much more than a completely unsolicited introduction to this show to realise that we are watching desperate and down trodden young people try to extend their acting careers by dramatizing themselves, when the producers only value them by the narrow prism of how much the audience fancies them. Think of it like Animal Farm only with bloody humans in real life. That’s how depressing I find this show.

  10. really great read– just wondering though about Geordie Shore and the impact on working class inhabitants, taste and how economic, political, race and class issues as well as employment and education factor into these shows. They’re basically dismissed. So what does it say about British RTV when these wider issues are being swept under the rug…..does it mean they dont matter. That shows like Geordie Shore are just there so we can laugh at people? Or are we meant to look beyond that?

  11. I wrote my dissertation on social class representations in reality tv this year, specifically focusing on GS and MIC. I’m so glad that other people have viewed it as I have, great read!

  12. Good afticle. Came to this after watching the first two episodes of MTVs ex on the beach (season 4). I was wondering why northern people seem to be the “preferred” choice of the programmes.

Leave a Reply