In the Wake of Khan: Why Star Trek Into Darkness Fans Should Consider Star Trek: TOS


When Star Trek first began its original run in 1966, for many, it was a symbol of an oncoming new era. During a time when cultural perceptions had been wholly influenced by the ever looming iron curtain, and news of a potential nuclear war threatened any hope for societal progression, Gene Roddenberry’s vision of the 23rd century grew into a beacon of hope that not only promised a future where humanity survived and travelled the stars, but did so with a curiosity and openness that left no room for petty conflict.

Since then, despite undergoing a final cancellation that could not be saved by fan campaigns or the great Lucille Ball, Star Trek has survived and even grown into a cultural behemoth that is endlessly referenced, critiqued, and debated. Holding the Guinness Book of World Records title for most spin-offs in TV history, there are very few other fictional titles that can boast the same breadth of cultural influence and timeless relevance. Yet, even with a devoted fanbase that has become largely self-sufficient in their endless creation of sub-cultures, languages, and fan series, the franchise seems to have experienced a sharp decline in public interest over the years. The reasoning, of course, is debatable. Although some would argue that the series has simply become exhausted after so many years on air, others would point to an overt move away from Roddenberry’s vision that has affected overall quality. Perhaps the true answer lies somewhere in the middle.

Star Trek

Nevertheless, the release of J.J Abrams’ re-envisioning of the Star Trek universe in 2009 was met with critical acclaim and a collective woop of excitement as he successfully introduced a Star Trek that was far more accessible and appealing to an uninitiated audience. While this was achieved through a heavier reliance on action and ‘make it up as you go along’ storytelling, the combination of sleek visuals and unexpected twists undoubtedly gave the series a greater staying power than other recent attempts had managed to accomplish.

It certainly can’t be denied, however, that the most recent instalments are far removed from where the series started out nearly fifty years ago. While they succeed as entertaining introductions to the series, and provide ample opportunity for older fans to bask in nostalgia, many would argue that the heart and soul of Roddenberry’s original vision just isn’t there. Lost in between breathtaking action sequences and throwaway references to Klingons are intricate alien cultures, an ever expanding sense of history, and moral discoveries that writers and fans have made together throughout its existence. While new fans may initially be quick to brush The Original Series, and its follow-ups, aside for their dated graphics, slower plotting, and (only sometimes) hammy acting, by doing so, they’re missing out on what is ultimately an unforgettable space adventure that is still capable of captivating fans, new and old.

A Wagon Train to the Stars

As a series meant to fuse the very best of science fiction and western storytelling, adventure and exploration are the driving forces behind many of the crew’s missions. While the stated purpose of the Enterprise is to seek out new life and perform acts of diplomacy, without fail, the crew still manages to find their survival threatened on a nearly weekly basis. This results in a well balanced combination of action and peaceful discussion that allows the crew to maintain their prime directive without sacrificing the need for plot-based conflict. Drawing on the talents of many well known genre fiction writers of the time, such as Richard Matheson (I Am Legend), Robert Bloch (Psycho), and George Clayton Johnson (The Twilight Zone), Gene Roddenberry went on to produce a number of episodes that incorporated commentary on several key political and social problems of the day, as well as a mix of moral dilemmas that fully utilized the series’ setting in space. As there were very few series at the time that were willing to target adult audiences and offer plot lines of a more serious nature, it soon became apparent that the series had a much heavier influence over viewers than originally suspected.

That shouldn’t leave you with the impression that The Original Series is one merely suited for its own time period, however. Among the episodes are a number that easily stand alone as perfectly fine tales of science fiction. Fan favourites include The City on the Edge of Forever, which won a Hugo award and introduces the crew to the dangers of time travel, The Enemy Within, in which Kirk is split into two opposing good and evil versions of himself, and The Balance of Terror, which is the first episode to introduce the Romulans and explore the Cold War through metaphor. While some of the plots may be recognizable to viewers of this day and age, as they’re ones that have been recycled numerous times through countless mediums, the quality of writing in these episodes remains very strong.

Of course, it’s also my duty to warn you that Star Trek does have its fair share of campy storylines and unintentional humour. Not all episodes can be considered great. In this instance, I turn you to the episodes Spock’s Brain and The Trouble with Tribbles. While the latter is another fan favourite that involves the infestation of the Enterprise by one particular fluff ball of a creature that Star Trek Into Darkness fans will definitely recognize, the former is one that is collectively remembered by fans and cast members alike as probably the worst episode Star Trek ever produced. As the name suggests, it involves an incident in which Spock’s brain is stolen by an alien life form and the crew’s attempts to retrieve it before Spock’s body dies. Now, I personally find the term “worst” subjective. Is it terrible? Sure. But is it entertaining? Oh my goodness, yes!

Before CGI

Given the ongoing fears of cancellation and budget cuts that repeatedly threatened the series’ success, there are several instances where you’ll most definitely feel yourself being slapped in the face by the series’ 1960’s production values. While the recent release of the re-mastered editions have gone a long way in improving some of the more technical effects, and I would recommend giving them a watch, there’s really only so much that could be done. But don’t let that deter you. The locales are very obviously made from set stages. The backgrounds are nothing more than giant paintings. But we also get a taste of such joys as…

The Man Trap
The Man Trap

Sulu’s beloved plant, with five moving digits and all.

The Savage Curtain

A special appearance by Lincoln, himself.

The Enemy Within

And this little guy.

These are truly artifacts from a time that we’ll never experience again, folks.

More Than a Space Opera

It may be difficult for some, but if you can look past the obviously glued together sets and less than terrifying creatures, you’ll find that Star Trek has a lot more to offer underneath. As I continue to make my way through a second viewing of The Original Series, I find myself still very impressed by the careful world building and thoughtful character development delivered in most episodes. Although the series is fairly episodic, and is produced in a way that is easy for new viewers to pick up at any point, its recurring themes and repeated allusions to certain character traits aid in the creation of a narrative structure that feels continuous despite its lack of story arcs. With each new planet and visitor to the Enterprise, little tidbits of info on the surrounding universe and the cultures therein are provided for the notice of attentive viewers. Over time, as we’re allowed greater glimpses into the world Roddenberry has created, viewers can expect to see the beginnings of plots and details that will later go on to define the Star Trek franchise as a whole.

The three characters to receive the most attention, of course, are Captain Kirk, Mr. Spock, and Dr. Leonard McCoy. While the other crew members are given enough moments to endear them to fans, their roles prove fairly minor when compared to the ones upheld by these three specifically. With Kirk as the determined and courageous leader, Spock filling the role of counsellor, and McCoy upholding the moral compass that the other two sometimes overlook, their interaction as a unit goes a long way in not only imbuing the series with a more genuine, human quality, but also in uncovering their specific vulnerabilities as they play off one another. For example, unlike Zachary Quinto’s Spock, the issue of Vulcans and their ability to experience emotion is not immediately explained. Like many other aspects of the series, it is only teased at during moments of weakness or when the history of Vulcan is being discussed. Only after some time has been spent watching Spock struggle with his human half do we eventually come to a better understanding of Vulcan ideology and Spock, himself. Details of McCoy’s time at Starfleet and the experiences that have shaped Kirk’s views as a Captain are similarly only uncovered over time. After following the crew through three seasons and six movies, I’ve found that the close attention to detail makes for a very satisfying watch as it eventually goes on to end on a particularly high note.

Its Legacy

Star Trek

“Course heading, Captain?”
“Second star to the right and straight on till morning.”

Even to this day, Star Trek remains a highly influential and integrated piece of popular culture. References and call backs have seeped into nearly everything, from skits and one off parody episodes, to music and academics. It’s been cited by many in the science field as a series that’s played a powerful role in inspiring their life-long passion for discovery, and is often remembered fondly for its cultivation of the belief that humanity is capable of anything. While I only touch on The Original Series in this article, it must be remembered that it is only the first act to what is a long and colourful history of new ideas and interpretations of the future. It’s certainly not perfect, and much of what it introduces is only refined as the franchise expands, but the mix of humour and creative storytelling do well to ensure that the series doesn’t merely fall into the shadow of its successors.

As Star Trek Into Darkness continues to garner mixed reviews, and seasoned Trek fans await the day that a new series is announced, new fans needn’t wait another four years to experience more of this vast universe.

What do you think? Leave a comment.

Posted on by
An English student with a taste for the surreal and love for all things science fiction, her thoughts generally linger on Star Trek, lit theory, and recent tv episodes.

Want to write about TV or other art forms?

Create writer account


  1. Oscar Porras

    Many of the issues that was taken up in the plot were truly forward looking. Out of the three seasons it was on air, first season arguably had the best plots.

    It will live in history as long as its images are preserved in some format or another. Thank you for writing about my favorite show of all time.

    • Jessica Koroll

      It’s no problem at all. Star Trek has had such a huge impact on our culture and I think it’s important to remember the ways it’s helped change things for the better.

  2. Sara Roncero-Menendez

    As a devoted Trekkie who has seen almost every incarnation of this series (except the animated one, I have to find a copy) I agree with this article. I’m also glad how you brought up the Kirk-Spock-McCoy connection which I missed in the reboot. Great article! Also, I recommend new fans also check out the TOS and Next Gen movies too!

    • Jessica Koroll

      Thank you! I’m glad to hear you enjoyed it. It would really make me happy to see more Kirk-Spock-McCoy interaction in future movies. McCoy kinda got pushed aside a lot in this last one.

  3. David Startup

    I really enjoyed both of the J.J. Abrams Star Trek films, but I’ve never ventured into watching any of the TV series – perhaps, and especially after this article, the time is nigh…

    • Jessica Koroll

      Please do! If you find that The Original Series doesn’t work for you, don’t be afraid to perhaps try some of the other ones. There’s a lot of interesting stuff there.

  4. Amanda Gostomski

    With the vulcan emotion thing slowly being revealed on the tv show, well its television show. The movies only have like two hours to give the very best of the character development. it more of comparing how two different types media have to tell a story.

    • Jessica Koroll

      Well, of course. It wasn’t my intention to outright critique Quinto’s Spock. I’m actually a huge fan of what they did with his character, given the time restraints. I was only trying to describe the series’ approach to character development by offering an example that Into Darkness fans could relate to.

  5. Jordan

    I watched the film “Wrath of Kaan” after seeing Into Darkness and was laughing at how bad the special effects were – which really detracted to my enjoyment of the film.
    Is the TV show more worth watching?

    • Jessica Koroll

      Ah, probably not. By TOS standards, The Wrath of Khan is a visual masterpiece. If you found the effects distracting there, you probably won’t be able to take the original series with a straight face. If you really wanted to, you could try The Next Generation series. I haven’t seen enough to really compare the effects, but it was made in the late 80s/early 90s, so they may be a little easier to handle? I’m happy to hear that you at least gave it a shot though.

    • I would definitely recommend Star Trek: TNG. The production is still low by today’s standards, but the makeup and effects are more refined. Clingons actually look like a separate species, for instance.

  6. Taylor Ramsey

    TOS’s effect are dated, but if you watch the Blu-ray (and on some of the streaming services) the effects are updated to look more modern, and NOT in an overt way.
    If you really want to give some great (about half of the episodes) stories a try, I recommend the Blu-rays. They look and sound wonderful, and the new effects really work well as great care was taken not to overwhelm the original production values.
    This was a nice, fun and nostalgic look at a series I grew up with, thanks!

  7. Andrew Couzens

    The Abrams Star Trek films really have very little to do with Star Trek. I can only see it as a cynical attempt to cash in on both fans of the series and mainstream audiences. I had hoped the first one would be an attempt to get audiences interested in the world before offering films (and perhaps a series!) more in line with the more philosophical and intelligent stories that made Star Trek the powerhouse it was.

    As it is, Into Darkness just took the series in the more action-oriented, flashy direction that I hoped they wouldn’t take. I wish they’d put a bit more thought into their scripts and a bit less into their effects.

    • Jessica Koroll

      I have to agree with you on that. I was a huge fan of the first film, since I had never seen any Star Trek before, and it even inspired me to give the series a go. After watching TOS and some of TNG though, the flaws definitely popped out at me more. I still like the first film well enough, but Into Darkness was a mess. Shoehorning Khan and the reactor scene in there was a terrible move.

      It really is a shame. If they could just get a capable crew and thoughtful director together, they could easily make a Star Trek that’s exciting and still worthy of its name.

  8. Deep space nine is my favorite entry to the franchise. It had a very intelligent and deep story arc to it and some great characters.

    • Yet they decided that DS9 was dark and released Voyager as a lite/bright version of the time. Personally i loved all the series , movies and incarnations. My friends and I get together on Mondays and watch movies and tv shows. We started at the beginning, watching the series then movies for said series. On second season of DS9 now. One of them liked everything but Enterprise, and has said this time he will try to watch it, as i pointed out they made references to it in the first relaunch-movie. As for the sometimes campyness, its held out better then some of the other series. Some that even tried to be almost serious, such as Space 1999, or Buck Rogers in the 25th century. (yes i have to those as well)

      • Voyager had its dark moments. ACtually one of my all time favorite episodes is in Voyager, have you watched “Year of Hell”? It’s a two parter.

        • Yes the first part was the one time i can honestly say i almost walked away from ST. Watched the second part, soon after it got better, imo. That was the point that got me, they made it cause they felt DS9 was too dark. I was like…its brighter then this one seems to be, getting whomped left and right.

          • The “There are four lights” episode of TNG is as dark as it gets. Can’t remember the name of the episode but you know it if you’ve seen it.

      • Jessica Koroll

        I find it really interesting that you mention that. For the longest time, DS9 was the one series that I never heard anyone mention during discussions. Only recently have I started to see it mentioned, and the general consensus seems to be: TOS introduced things, TNG refined them, while DS9 took them further into darker territory. I’m surprised that they would think the franchise needed to be lightened up, especially considering that views on Voyageur seem to be pretty mixed.

  9. Kelsey Clark

    I LOVE the original series in all its lameness! JJ Abrams has done a wonderful job here and the special effects are fantastic. Great article. Great read.

  10. Erica Beimesche

    I knew nothing about Star Trek when I saw the 2009 reboot. Then I forgot everything I saw. When “Into Darkness” came out, I saw it and was so intrigued by the Trek universe that I began watching TOS, and I’m nearly done with season 3. At first, with “The Man Trap,” it was so slow I nearly quit. However, I made it through, and I am so glad I did. Star Trek offers what is really an advanced and progressive outlook on politics, morality, and technology for its time. The science behind it all is astounding, seeing as man hadn’t even stepped on the moon when the show began. Despite some obvious sexism at some points, many aspects of TOS are forward-thinking in terms of equality and other social issues from the 60s. I even find the methodical, low-budget storytelling more engaging than today’s action-packed and forgettable blockbusters (in movies and television). They take time to craft storylines and characters, rather than dumping volumes of characterization on viewers all at once. I had no idea who McCoy was at the beginning, and they didn’t come out and tell me exactly what he was about, either. I learned his passions, downfalls, and tendencies from watching multiple episodes, witnessing his reactions, and hearing his dialogue. Even though the cheese-factor skyrockets at times, the content of the writing distinguishes TOS above all. Shows that influence generations like Star Trek are hard to come by these days.

  11. Ben Hufbauer

    Jessica Koroll has written a very good appreciation and analysis of TOS here. Good to see that the show is still gaining some new fans after all these years. I first watched when I was 5 year old with my babysitter in 1969. For fun, she dressed me up as a little kid version of Spock! And last Halloween, at the age of 50, I dressed as Spock again for the first time. How the years fly by!

  12. I’m a diehard Trekkie, have been from the day I was born. While I have my own reservations in regards to Abrams’ latest incarnation of Khan as well as other elements of Trek, he has indeed captured its spirit which is the most important thing of all. Star Trek is the epitome of sci-fi culture, for it gives us the opportunity to see the future through a rosy pair of glasses and inspires us to build towards that future, regardless how nay-sayers may diverge us. This franchise will always define my personal aspirations for better and brighter world.

Leave a Reply